(Total Views: 458)
Posted On: 03/24/2021 1:40:31 PM
Post# of 153886
One confusing thing that came out of the last CC, and hoping to get clarifications/opinions from the group.
So we know that Dr. Kelly flew to LA to meet with some big investor. When the question was asked in the CC for an update on this LA investor, NP went on to give the anecdotal summary of a LA patient.
- did NP just misunderstand the question and responded on a LA patient and not the investor?
- are they one and the same? A wealthy patient in LA was helped by LL and wants to, according to NP, "help any way they can" out of gratitude?
- is this the billionaire mentioned in past CC's?
If they are all one and the same, I'd say get a term friendly loan from this investor. $50-100M is nothing to a billionaire, especially if you owe your life to the drug and you'd be in essence "paying it forward." And CYDY is not necessarily looking for charity, just something better than than the Fife deals so everyone wins in this situation.
So we know that Dr. Kelly flew to LA to meet with some big investor. When the question was asked in the CC for an update on this LA investor, NP went on to give the anecdotal summary of a LA patient.
- did NP just misunderstand the question and responded on a LA patient and not the investor?
- are they one and the same? A wealthy patient in LA was helped by LL and wants to, according to NP, "help any way they can" out of gratitude?
- is this the billionaire mentioned in past CC's?
If they are all one and the same, I'd say get a term friendly loan from this investor. $50-100M is nothing to a billionaire, especially if you owe your life to the drug and you'd be in essence "paying it forward." And CYDY is not necessarily looking for charity, just something better than than the Fife deals so everyone wins in this situation.
(2)
(0)
