(Total Views: 602)
Posted On: 03/22/2021 6:05:21 PM
Post# of 145876
Correct, but again (for the last time), we've gotten various "explanations" from both Patterson and CytoDyn, so the only objective party is the FDA. Their communications will absolutely illustrate their thoughts and response on the matter. They won't interject themselves, but at CytoDyn's request / waiver of confidentiality, there's no legitimate reason they wouldn't acquiesce.
It may not be prudent to do that at this point or ever. But it's the only possible way.
People really need to read the entire thread/response history before responding.
It may not be prudent to do that at this point or ever. But it's the only possible way.
People really need to read the entire thread/response history before responding.
Quote:
The FDA is not going to interject themselves by asking a company to release their inside information or release it themselves. The FDA considers any information that passes between the company and the FDA as proprietary information until the company releases it themselves or it's a safety issue.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/605...z6pseMnwwB
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)