(Total Views: 432)
Posted On: 03/08/2021 3:15:10 PM
Post# of 148936
Yes, I get it Eyedr. She's got her hands full but its a clear and present danger for her to not give at least an EUA for Vyrologix as it works in spite of Amerex getting it wrong along with anyone else that didn't push the board and Dr. NP to strongly advise them of the faults of the trial design if they knew of them at the beginning of their designing it.
I emailed JW because I felt I had to in light of what we saw in the trial result points of CD-12. They were better than those that already got EUA's and I didn't really say don't listen to politics but rather listen to the humane side of it. If a drug works, and it's as safe as saline, and results shows it saves lives and even those who were the sickest of the sick population in the trials, IND's and OLE's, why deprive those in the ICU's now, so get something better than those filbuster drugs now in those ICU's with less efficacy then Vyrologix?
I digress for it's just a shame IMO so GLTU and thanks for posting to me
HCIT
I emailed JW because I felt I had to in light of what we saw in the trial result points of CD-12. They were better than those that already got EUA's and I didn't really say don't listen to politics but rather listen to the humane side of it. If a drug works, and it's as safe as saline, and results shows it saves lives and even those who were the sickest of the sick population in the trials, IND's and OLE's, why deprive those in the ICU's now, so get something better than those filbuster drugs now in those ICU's with less efficacy then Vyrologix?
I digress for it's just a shame IMO so GLTU and thanks for posting to me
HCIT
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
