Quote:

---

My point to make, my opinion, regardless of my above theory, if for example he knew our s/c trial data missed the PE, but the FDA was attempting to scrutinize the data in order to justify an EUA, then, this would have been extremely risky and stupid and negative "risking" his integrity and credibility, for Nader to have made the above statements.

---

I agree with you. I don't think he would be so careless, but his past actions force me to think that its possible. Again, I believe that all of the indicators continue to point to a positive outcome, but I am trying to be pragmatic.

At the end of the day this interview is trivial compared to the actual decision we receive from the FDA. I believe NP is confident in the results, but to be fair he is always confident. So, I dont read much into it.

I go back to the math and the science. Both of which appear to me, to support the premise of a successful trial, but we wont know until we know.