(Total Views: 292)
Posted On: 03/05/2021 8:36:49 AM
Post# of 11039
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d7f1/0d7f1ff3c38eeb3bdc813dcfde17af66ca2f29f1" alt="Avatar"
A very rare U3 halt was issued by FINRA during the dividend distribution back in 2015. Why would a clearing firm handle a tradional process with a buy in notice knowing such a "Major Systemic Risk" can happen with CRGP, a shell corporation that actually paid millions of dollars in total to its shareholders. How does this happen at all? How can we trust a clearing firm to follow standard procedures in regards to quality control and risk management? We can't, COR wanted to appoint a receiver to take back the dividend from shareholders and failed...thank goodness
...which is why we need a judge's emergency order for resolution in custodianship and protect our property.
Just sharing some thoughts....
onehundredmph Friday, 03/05/21 07:52:08 AM
Re: harmanepa post# 48838 0
Post #
48839
of 48839
SSM should request a motion for an emergency buy-in to address the custodianship debacle once and for all.
This is the traditional method
https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebook...ules/11810
Who was buying hundreds of millions of shares starting on April 3 2020?
Surely it would be logical SSM is a shareholder aswell or maybe its Lockwood? Who knows...but at this point.
Who is protecting our property?
I don't see why a judge cannot step in with an emergency order to protect our property.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=162348382
$CRGP
...which is why we need a judge's emergency order for resolution in custodianship and protect our property.
Just sharing some thoughts....
onehundredmph Friday, 03/05/21 07:52:08 AM
Re: harmanepa post# 48838 0
Post #
48839
of 48839
SSM should request a motion for an emergency buy-in to address the custodianship debacle once and for all.
This is the traditional method
https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebook...ules/11810
Who was buying hundreds of millions of shares starting on April 3 2020?
Surely it would be logical SSM is a shareholder aswell or maybe its Lockwood? Who knows...but at this point.
Who is protecting our property?
I don't see why a judge cannot step in with an emergency order to protect our property.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=162348382
$CRGP
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb77/adb7740ca48a07c2cf61774408f9d657c4173a68" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37b54/37b5463b3c4bc7cf5e47c9267f021349baa643a1" alt=""
U.S. Constitution
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f35e/8f35e19d1237495d20e5aa2b03d8f7d5f4d27e6a" alt="qpnycangel.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c13d/4c13d5122e5d308f2c7a4dfb7246790080656082" alt="fdw[fAmerica_Soldier_Flag.png"
Quote:
If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/
Scroll down for more posts ▼