(Total Views: 383)
Posted On: 02/26/2021 1:55:12 PM
Post# of 72440
You are correct as to that point. I am not arguing about that and I stand corrected. Thank you.
But realistically (not that being realistic overshadows trial procedure) if ALL patients are getting SOC and only 50% are getting B and only 50% of patients are walking away while others show next to no improvement (and that percentage is near the 50% level of all patients dosed) it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to realize the most likely reason is the developmental drug (
is the factor causing the improvement in patients.
I take it then there must be an absolute minimum of people at each trial site that issues the IV bag to the nurses and this person sure would be susceptible to bribes by naked shorts to switcheroo the bags. Another good reason Leo didn't say much in the PR beyond what was required.
But realistically (not that being realistic overshadows trial procedure) if ALL patients are getting SOC and only 50% are getting B and only 50% of patients are walking away while others show next to no improvement (and that percentage is near the 50% level of all patients dosed) it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to realize the most likely reason is the developmental drug (
is the factor causing the improvement in patients. I take it then there must be an absolute minimum of people at each trial site that issues the IV bag to the nurses and this person sure would be susceptible to bribes by naked shorts to switcheroo the bags. Another good reason Leo didn't say much in the PR beyond what was required.
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
