It looks like you are throwing shade again, JD. Back in December when you attacked Minns based on your superior knowledge as a legal professional the consensus view was that you are a troll from the other board. Your questions have the flavor of credibility but if you've been reading this board you know the answer to these questions yourself. You know the state of our collective knowledge. The place to start is with what Steve submitted to the SEC detailing the terms of our partnership with Pasaca.

Here is where you identified yourself as a legal professional. This admission really provoked a lot of questions for me. It defies any understanding I have of how such a professional would behave or present him or her self.

“Jaydee” stands for J.D., which is an abbreviation for “juris doctor.” It’s a lot less flamboyant sounding than “Esquire.” I was a litigator in California for a few decades. I sued big companies for a living for a long time. That’s where my perspective on this issue comes from.

On the other hand, maybe you’re the one who is right. Wouldn’t make a lot of sense, but it’s happened before.

Regardless, you need to ask yourself a question—is QTMM in the business of manufacturing, marketing and licensing its quantum dot technology or is QTMM in the business of prosecuting lawsuits? If it’s the latter, that’s a horrible business plan. If it’s the former, then why in the hell are they wasting their valuable time suing former attorneys? Seems to me this a critical time in the development of their COVID product. If they’re not valuing their time and resources at a higher level than this, then maybe their time and resources simply aren’t that valuable, which would not be a good thing for me, their shareholder.

Feel free to disregard my perspective. I mean, jeez, what could I know? It’s not like I’m a blogger,