Personally, I think last night (posts) was overall productive. Some important things were clarified. Communication is the key, but it all boils down to semantics. Semantics, the bane of human existence.

To me, what has been lost, is that the written word (text) that has been referenced over and over (Feb 5 CC) is a transcript of verbal communication, not a proof read, lawyer generated legal document. How many time have we been in a meeting, and after it was over, thought to ourselves, I wish I had said that better, I can’t remember if I also told them about... OR the dreaded: Why did I say THAT? I hope no one was listening (let alone recording the meeting, making a transcript and then posting it for all the world to read).

Now that the “7-10 day” perceived debacle has been cleared up (do your own DD and read last night’s posts), it is probably time to “put this puppy to rest” and move on.

I do need to make one retraction when I said “We just can’t call him(Joe) up and have a heart to heart talk.” Apparently we can, according to a last night’s post. However, in order to avoid a future board posting kerfuffle, if you do call, please remember the Joe is a CEO of two companies and not your unemployed buddy, idly sitting on the couch, anxiously waiting for a phone call. You may not be able to talk with him when you want to and/or for as long as you want to, and that he is restricted by the SEC on what and how much he can say.