(Total Views: 753)
Posted On: 02/09/2021 11:32:16 PM
Post# of 155780
This is going to be the first of two "less-optimistic" posts.
There must have been 100 posts talking about "FDA's request for the data" in the past 8 days.
Just asking: Isn't the sole and singular source for this an off-handed comment by NP on the kind of strange webinar with the doctors in the Philippines? Has it somehow become a fact that FDA asked for the raw data?
Can anyone think of another time that NP made an off the cuff remark about an interaction with the FDA that many relied on and turned out to be "misleading" (to be generous)? What about when he said they requested an EUA after CD10?
My point: IMO, IMO.......When NP says "the FDA asked for the data", it might mean something different than what we all think it means.
There must have been 100 posts talking about "FDA's request for the data" in the past 8 days.
Just asking: Isn't the sole and singular source for this an off-handed comment by NP on the kind of strange webinar with the doctors in the Philippines? Has it somehow become a fact that FDA asked for the raw data?
Can anyone think of another time that NP made an off the cuff remark about an interaction with the FDA that many relied on and turned out to be "misleading" (to be generous)? What about when he said they requested an EUA after CD10?
My point: IMO, IMO.......When NP says "the FDA asked for the data", it might mean something different than what we all think it means.
(8)
(0)
