(Total Views: 687)
Posted On: 02/05/2021 11:14:57 PM
Post# of 156297
I hate to say I am very impressed with that post, because of my reputation here, the complement could hurt your reputation.
You are a clear thinker the best scientist is the one who doubts the hypothesis they are testing. Not only searching for support of a conclusion that can not be made with current data. That is why I brought this topic up, which fell into my lap because a friend had Pancreatic Cancer. I was roundly criticized for trying to deride LL, really.
I can tell you are enthusiastic about this topic, nothing in my past was more exciting than sharing that thirst of knowledge with peers. It is not NP’s role to understand this kind of applicability, and IMO SK is a nice guy who reads papers and spits out summaries.
I have been accused of being some kind of mole, would the members tolerate a CYDY MOLE?
You are a clear thinker the best scientist is the one who doubts the hypothesis they are testing. Not only searching for support of a conclusion that can not be made with current data. That is why I brought this topic up, which fell into my lap because a friend had Pancreatic Cancer. I was roundly criticized for trying to deride LL, really.
I can tell you are enthusiastic about this topic, nothing in my past was more exciting than sharing that thirst of knowledge with peers. It is not NP’s role to understand this kind of applicability, and IMO SK is a nice guy who reads papers and spits out summaries.
I have been accused of being some kind of mole, would the members tolerate a CYDY MOLE?
(1)
(2)
