Quote by docj: "I want to believe the award was provided because they knew the work that was done throughout 2020 was going to create significant shareholder value in early 2021."

I am absolutely agreeing with you on this, I am really wanting to believe that ...

However, it would leave a terrible aftertaste, if they'd follow through with it as planned, because it then might be seen as if they hold back their news ammunition until after the 31st, such that employees get the best deal and share of the company out of that "award" money paid out in shares, while the pps is still low (due to the lack of substantial information provided by the company to the public YET). Only to then start the IR campaign right afterwards, now THAT would really leave a terrible message to me as a long term shareholder.

I truly hope that this is not going to happen that way. In this I fully agree with "Southbill" that employees should be very well rewarded for their achievements, and them having been announced publicly and the set goals, such as GNBT share price appreciated, NGIO and subsequently GNBT listed on Nasdaq, vaccine efficacy at least demonstrated in lab tests and clinical trials started, etc., have been reached.

One after the next and in the right order. Not hoping for results to show up ahead of the deadline, then call it "unfortunately not", but still continue with the award giving. Do you agree?