(Total Views: 501)
Posted On: 01/12/2021 9:49:23 AM
Post# of 82690
Maronti, my guess is that zero of it is true.
Let's say O'Leary did, in fact, mention SFOR on CNBC. What happens then?
OK, it gets more peoples' eyes on SFOR but what they see is very unlikely to compel them to buy shares. Because our CEO says SafeVChat is "probably" the most secure? What about no profits in 20 years?
We've had 2 reports on SafeVChat posted here, I can't remember if the same person twice or two different people. Both reports, by shareholders, presumably, stated that the quality is not satisfactory in terms of video and audio resolution and that it lacks features the competitors have. Where are reports of its greatness in those categories?
The other stuff is about as true as the Gallagher deal making us all happy we've invested in this stock. I don't know how anyone can conclude that SFOR is of an investable grade. And these guys here who are so bizarrely so enamored of it are, sadly, lost causes.
Let's say O'Leary did, in fact, mention SFOR on CNBC. What happens then?
OK, it gets more peoples' eyes on SFOR but what they see is very unlikely to compel them to buy shares. Because our CEO says SafeVChat is "probably" the most secure? What about no profits in 20 years?
We've had 2 reports on SafeVChat posted here, I can't remember if the same person twice or two different people. Both reports, by shareholders, presumably, stated that the quality is not satisfactory in terms of video and audio resolution and that it lacks features the competitors have. Where are reports of its greatness in those categories?
The other stuff is about as true as the Gallagher deal making us all happy we've invested in this stock. I don't know how anyone can conclude that SFOR is of an investable grade. And these guys here who are so bizarrely so enamored of it are, sadly, lost causes.
(1)
(0)
