(Total Views: 691)
Posted On: 01/06/2021 11:58:59 PM
Post# of 148984
Re: ClosetInvestor #71648
None of that made any sense. It supports the view of many you are a basher.
To answer a question you tried to distort: Assuming for argument 10% of deaths occur during days 29-42, 42-day data on 75% of patients should have as many events as 28 days of data on 82.5% of patients.
The DSMC was just offering an alternative way to get to adequate power faster. It wasn't needed.
To answer a question you tried to distort: Assuming for argument 10% of deaths occur during days 29-42, 42-day data on 75% of patients should have as many events as 28 days of data on 82.5% of patients.
The DSMC was just offering an alternative way to get to adequate power faster. It wasn't needed.
(7)
(1)
Scroll down for more posts ▼