I agree it’s vital to be objective and critical, regardless of sentiment. I just don’t think it’s advantageous to discuss the negatives on a public board where people with agendas against the company can exploit that information and more widely distort it. I find it better to create smaller groups that are better moderated when discussing stuff like that, and have the more public groups be less about speculation and concerns and more about sharing research, facts, and encouragement. Heavily populated groups like this do just as much harm as good for the investor community.