CDiddy..your point of concurrent trials is dead on..we've had to dismiss in the past because of the obvious expense associated with any trial much less 60 plus trials and counting...then we will see what our science board is really all about....It's tantalizing to fantasize,,....but,...I'll leave that to others who are better schooled and have meaningful numbers already digested....and who clearly understand the complexities of the various indications much better than myself. I bid you adieu...an early tee time calls.