I don't understand nor care if you believe me to me a "soft basher", logically it makes no sense. I've already stated that I have enough confidence in the twitter to account. The things posted on the twitter account are positive enough to warrant a position.

I'm simply trying to find some proof that the LinkedIn is not an imposter.

Just because it existed first isn't proof.
Just because there are "500+" connections doesn't prove it's him.
Just because there are private messages that people have screenshotted doesn't provide proof.

As I said before proof that the LinkedIn is him can only strengthen the things that have been posted here before.