(Total Views: 474)
Posted On: 11/20/2020 12:22:11 PM
Post# of 149993
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
Re: ClosetInvestor #66042
In a court case, even if the judge is going to rule against you, in order to appeal and preserve your rights, you must still make the argument and preserve the record. I am worried that CYDY might be allowing "CYDYs standing with the FDA" to be a doormat. Can't get much worse than that. To improve your standing, you sometimes must "stand up."
By the way, what happened the last time CYDY stood up to the FDA? Yes, they did once. It was when they asked for the initial EINDs for treatment of Covid-19, and the FDA refused to consider it. It was not NP that stood up to them, but Dr. Harish Seethamraju that stood up to the FDA on behalf of not merely CYDY, but his dying patients. Guess what, the FDA backed down and granted every one of the EINDs that CYDY/Seethamraju requested.
Time for Dr. Mahboob U. Rahman to earn his keep and step up to the plate and "explain" to the FDA that they must approve the EUA.
By the way, what happened the last time CYDY stood up to the FDA? Yes, they did once. It was when they asked for the initial EINDs for treatment of Covid-19, and the FDA refused to consider it. It was not NP that stood up to them, but Dr. Harish Seethamraju that stood up to the FDA on behalf of not merely CYDY, but his dying patients. Guess what, the FDA backed down and granted every one of the EINDs that CYDY/Seethamraju requested.
Time for Dr. Mahboob U. Rahman to earn his keep and step up to the plate and "explain" to the FDA that they must approve the EUA.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)
Scroll down for more posts ▼