(Total Views: 890)
Posted On: 11/16/2020 2:06:35 AM
Post# of 154737
Re: ClosetInvestor #65555
If you're attempting to make it appear to the less knowledgeable that you're successfully refuting a post, point by point, make sure you include all the points.
The most important point, that any reasonable person can understand, is exactly that. Great fanfare accompanied the announcement that studies of Mara for LHers were underway. As they should be. Looking forward to the results in a few months, along with trial teams and review boards around the world, most likely. In the meantime, and especially in the US, any hospital or physician who uses a "best guess" approach and has patients worsen or die under their care will be facing hordes of ravenous shysters, probably more than a few of whom are already clogging CYDY'S news feed with frivolous suits. The malpractice suits will be much less frivolous.
There's no need to admit anything; those SAEs are documented... I'm illustrating they actually exist, not admitting they're somehow only theoretical.
Where's the research backing your conjecture? I've found zero investigations into CV19/Mara.
Irrelevant / not germane. Or maybe it is... Maybe ibuprofen in combo with Mara in CV19 infected has a deadly interaction. But we don't know because nobody's looked into it. Where or how ibuprofen is sold is wholly irrelevant, however.
Nobody mentioned BP.. do you think he could be misconstrued as a rabid cheerleader? Strange. No, these people have zero or only the barest of credentials or expertise. So we have one fairly based hypothesis and a bunch of blind parroting, but still no studies.
Mara's effects in CV19 have not been studied.
There is non-zero risk of significant SAEs in organ systems affected by CV19... Not knowing how non-zero that risk is, is asking for trouble.
There's a reason Mara is only being looked at for LHers currently.
I've been a shareholder since 1919, and have 25 million shares, so clearly I should know better than you, random person on the internet.
Quote:
the reality is that it won't gain widespread adoption without studies to explore these issues. And studies have begun, as they should.
The most important point, that any reasonable person can understand, is exactly that. Great fanfare accompanied the announcement that studies of Mara for LHers were underway. As they should be. Looking forward to the results in a few months, along with trial teams and review boards around the world, most likely. In the meantime, and especially in the US, any hospital or physician who uses a "best guess" approach and has patients worsen or die under their care will be facing hordes of ravenous shysters, probably more than a few of whom are already clogging CYDY'S news feed with frivolous suits. The malpractice suits will be much less frivolous.
Quote:
So you admit that the side effects (including SAEs) are possible
There's no need to admit anything; those SAEs are documented... I'm illustrating they actually exist, not admitting they're somehow only theoretical.
Quote:
and not likely to occur in every patient?
Where's the research backing your conjecture? I've found zero investigations into CV19/Mara.
Quote:
Steven Johnson’s has been reported as a side effect of ibuprofen but that doesn’t stop it from being sold over the counter.
Irrelevant / not germane. Or maybe it is... Maybe ibuprofen in combo with Mara in CV19 infected has a deadly interaction. But we don't know because nobody's looked into it. Where or how ibuprofen is sold is wholly irrelevant, however.
Quote:
several rabid cheerleaders
Nobody mentioned BP.. do you think he could be misconstrued as a rabid cheerleader? Strange. No, these people have zero or only the barest of credentials or expertise. So we have one fairly based hypothesis and a bunch of blind parroting, but still no studies.
Mara's effects in CV19 have not been studied.
There is non-zero risk of significant SAEs in organ systems affected by CV19... Not knowing how non-zero that risk is, is asking for trouble.
There's a reason Mara is only being looked at for LHers currently.
I've been a shareholder since 1919, and have 25 million shares, so clearly I should know better than you, random person on the internet.
(4)
(1)
