(Total Views: 613)
Posted On: 10/26/2020 10:51:40 AM
Post# of 155608
I go back and forth on unblinding. The people here make great cases on both sides.
The case for not unblinding puts a lot of trust in an FDA that frankly hasn't done much to earn it.
The case for unblinding puts a lot of trust in a sympathetic media, or a CytoDyn PR dept., that frankly hasn't done much to earn it.
Big Pharma has it's greasy fingers deep into the FDA and the media, so that just leaves....CYDY's PR department.
Either way, we're boned.
So I guess I'm leaning towards not pissing off the only institution with the power to wipe away all the obstacles: the FDA.
And it hurts to say that, because I hate those MFers right now.
The case for not unblinding puts a lot of trust in an FDA that frankly hasn't done much to earn it.
The case for unblinding puts a lot of trust in a sympathetic media, or a CytoDyn PR dept., that frankly hasn't done much to earn it.
Big Pharma has it's greasy fingers deep into the FDA and the media, so that just leaves....CYDY's PR department.
Either way, we're boned.
So I guess I'm leaning towards not pissing off the only institution with the power to wipe away all the obstacles: the FDA.
And it hurts to say that, because I hate those MFers right now.
(2)
(0)
