(Total Views: 280)
Posted On: 10/26/2020 6:36:36 AM
Post# of 82676
Good morning. I have considered your statement.
The way that I see it, in my opinion, is as follows. There are three scenarios:
1. Since March, the Company has created value for shareholders that can offset the large paper losses.
2. One is not willing to have paid 99% of their investment toward salaries and other company expenses since March that has led to these paper losses.
3. One believes paying a 99% paper loss is fair for the company’s current and future prospects and for sharing in the Company’s vision. There are no corporate “do-overs.”
As far as eating, one should not have to break the law to eat and should find a solution that does not harm someone else in this situation.
The way that I see it, in my opinion, is as follows. There are three scenarios:
1. Since March, the Company has created value for shareholders that can offset the large paper losses.
2. One is not willing to have paid 99% of their investment toward salaries and other company expenses since March that has led to these paper losses.
3. One believes paying a 99% paper loss is fair for the company’s current and future prospects and for sharing in the Company’s vision. There are no corporate “do-overs.”
As far as eating, one should not have to break the law to eat and should find a solution that does not harm someone else in this situation.
(1)
(0)
My comments are only my opinion and are not to be used for investment advice. Please conduct your own due diligence before choosing to buy or sell any investment.
Scroll down for more posts ▼
