(Total Views: 552)
Posted On: 10/23/2020 6:40:54 AM
Post# of 154115
I will play devils advocate with your own words...you say the FDA <<Guidance for an EUA is "may be effective" with a good safety profile>>
Then you say, <<agencies in other countries don't have the data to base a decision on>>
What the heck, treated patients with a NEWS2 score above 4 in the mild/moderate was damned compelling. Plus it is a well known fact that most of Europe is far less stringent and way less beholden to the lobby money of big pharma. That means 1+1 should equal 2 over there and seems way more plausible to get a deal across the pond(s).
My much bigger and only question is how much of this foreign talk stuff is real or just standard unfiltered nader speak. I can no longer trust almost anything he says.
I do believe in the science
Then you say, <<agencies in other countries don't have the data to base a decision on>>
What the heck, treated patients with a NEWS2 score above 4 in the mild/moderate was damned compelling. Plus it is a well known fact that most of Europe is far less stringent and way less beholden to the lobby money of big pharma. That means 1+1 should equal 2 over there and seems way more plausible to get a deal across the pond(s).
My much bigger and only question is how much of this foreign talk stuff is real or just standard unfiltered nader speak. I can no longer trust almost anything he says.
I do believe in the science
(3)
(1)
