(Total Views: 387)
Posted On: 10/21/2020 9:01:01 AM
Post# of 148908
Nickie,
You asked why Why wasn't some of the stock awarded to NP et. al. set aside for potential funding"
The stock grant pool, against which many voted, are intended as inducements to both retain and attract new talent, i.e. Dr. Recknor and Dr. Rahman (pulled from Mesoblast).
Your question presupposes that the remaining 75 million authorized shares are insufficient for operations over the upcoming months.
$200 million should be sufficient for quite some time, IMO, until EUA or Approval for COVID and HIV.
I do not see any additional question that has failed to me answered. Please reply with something more specific than ANSWER ME THAT
Thanks
You asked why Why wasn't some of the stock awarded to NP et. al. set aside for potential funding"
The stock grant pool, against which many voted, are intended as inducements to both retain and attract new talent, i.e. Dr. Recknor and Dr. Rahman (pulled from Mesoblast).
Your question presupposes that the remaining 75 million authorized shares are insufficient for operations over the upcoming months.
$200 million should be sufficient for quite some time, IMO, until EUA or Approval for COVID and HIV.
I do not see any additional question that has failed to me answered. Please reply with something more specific than ANSWER ME THAT
Thanks
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
