(Total Views: 252)
Posted On: 10/21/2020 8:52:36 AM
Post# of 82687
How are you concluding that the competitors products are "non-patented"? Even Mark Kay has stated, repeatedly, that our patents cover a very narrow range of IP - it's not a binary situation. Another reasonable conclusion would be that the competitors software is also patented to cover a different narrow range. Either way, they're clearly selling more than we are.
Another issue that you're ignoring is the necessity of keystroke encryption, at all. My brief and insufficient research has led me to believe that some of these evil doers can be stopped before they can enter a device, making keystroke encryption unnecessary.
Either way, any way you cut it, a lack of revenue for 15 years is not the kind of thing that's going to bring excited new investors in to get that share price to rise up.
Another issue that you're ignoring is the necessity of keystroke encryption, at all. My brief and insufficient research has led me to believe that some of these evil doers can be stopped before they can enter a device, making keystroke encryption unnecessary.
Either way, any way you cut it, a lack of revenue for 15 years is not the kind of thing that's going to bring excited new investors in to get that share price to rise up.
(1)
(0)
