(Total Views: 518)
Posted On: 10/04/2020 5:19:05 PM
Post# of 22465
If you open up the court document, the two main headers state:
"In the supreme court of Texas"
(Followed by some info, then states):
"Reply in support of petition for review".
Ted combined the two, then added "filed on behalf of K&L Gates". I don't think he was being purposely nefarious, but I agree that when I first read the post, it made it appear that the court was the one who made the argument.
The post should have been more clear to avoid confusion.
"In the supreme court of Texas"
(Followed by some info, then states):
"Reply in support of petition for review".
Ted combined the two, then added "filed on behalf of K&L Gates". I don't think he was being purposely nefarious, but I agree that when I first read the post, it made it appear that the court was the one who made the argument.
The post should have been more clear to avoid confusion.
(0)
(0)
My posts is of my opinion only. Please conduct your own Due Diligence; this is YOUR investment.
