(Total Views: 965)
Posted On: 10/03/2020 10:42:46 PM
Post# of 154140
Folks, I think this entire post is straight up FUD served with a side dish of deception. Filled to the brim with logical fallacies that have nothing to do with the efficacy of leronlimab. Leronlimab is an inanimate object that doesn't need any scientist's support to prove its worth. If CytoDyn were to hire 50 world renowned scientists tomorrow, it would not change the nature of leronlimab.
If Trump's team is basing treatment off the track records of scientists, safety profile, and the science, it's a no-brainer that they would consider it, no?
Dr. BP is the scientist and even if he is no longer involved with the company, we can't rewrite history to exclude his support for leronlimab (which continues to this day based on a recent tweet).
The drug has an excellent safety profile.
The science based on the MOA, EINDs, and current trials implies efficacy.
If Trump's team is basing treatment off the track records of scientists, safety profile, and the science, it's a no-brainer that they would consider it, no?
Dr. BP is the scientist and even if he is no longer involved with the company, we can't rewrite history to exclude his support for leronlimab (which continues to this day based on a recent tweet).
The drug has an excellent safety profile.
The science based on the MOA, EINDs, and current trials implies efficacy.
(12)
(0)
