I asked Tails in another forum, but of course he can't answer so I'll ask you.

What "reasoning" led you to believe Tinkerbell 2.0 was all they claimed it was?

You agreed with Tails when he said.....and I quote

Quote:

---

You are never going to convince someone of something when they don't want to be convinced of it. They weren't reasoned into their opinions so they can't be reasoned out of it.

---

You are copy/pasting from their website unproven claims that were there before they even completed testing (assuming they are done now).

You can't reason someone into believe something without reason, correct?

So what was it?

TIA