(Total Views: 343)
Posted On: 09/26/2020 9:46:28 PM
Post# of 7803
Since Endurance has known wrecks sites (plural), and this clown show does not have a clue, the testing of Tinkerbell 2.0 might be better suited for one of Endurance's sites, don't you think?
You saw they mosaics, right?
It might be helpful to you guys to test there, not Melbourne. I know you could certainly use help with the testing.
Does Tinkerbell 2.0 (ahem) perform at 5000 ft? In fact, does it perform at all?
If so, can you provide proof? Everyone knows it isn't autonomous. Plus last I heard spotters were needed as it glided through the shallow water.
Your sense of humor is welcomed, but think through the jokes first. Just a suggestion.
You saw they mosaics, right?
It might be helpful to you guys to test there, not Melbourne. I know you could certainly use help with the testing.
Does Tinkerbell 2.0 (ahem) perform at 5000 ft? In fact, does it perform at all?
If so, can you provide proof? Everyone knows it isn't autonomous. Plus last I heard spotters were needed as it glided through the shallow water.
Your sense of humor is welcomed, but think through the jokes first. Just a suggestion.
(0)
(0)
