(Total Views: 641)
Posted On: 09/25/2020 7:40:12 AM
Post# of 153887
Haha ...nice try...I voted no..and if I could reduce Nader’s salary I would do that as well. His interests will be aligned with ours when he realizes there is NOT an unlimited time to market and that at least one milestone:
1. Did he actually block Patterson’s paper?
2. HIV BLA debacle.
3. Parting ways (this is obviously what happened) with Patterson
needs to be met. Like I said if DSM gives them a 3 than ok..it says to the world someone other than Cytodyn (read NADER) says this is real. Until that happens NO CAR KEYS!! Nader is implying that without me the whole thing could implode so you better give me what I want. My answer is without us there is no company and at .75 a share I’m willing to draw the line ...at some point. Let’s see what happens with DSM and THEN decide about funding.
1. Did he actually block Patterson’s paper?
2. HIV BLA debacle.
3. Parting ways (this is obviously what happened) with Patterson
needs to be met. Like I said if DSM gives them a 3 than ok..it says to the world someone other than Cytodyn (read NADER) says this is real. Until that happens NO CAR KEYS!! Nader is implying that without me the whole thing could implode so you better give me what I want. My answer is without us there is no company and at .75 a share I’m willing to draw the line ...at some point. Let’s see what happens with DSM and THEN decide about funding.
(3)
(1)
