(Total Views: 587)
Posted On: 09/16/2020 9:53:42 PM
Post# of 145879
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
So NASDAQ is making its decision next week. We were at $5 when NP announced the call a week early and then we dropped a buck. Now, post call, we’ll likely lose another buck.
If NP had never PR’d a call and stayed silent until next week, I’m fairly confident we’d remain in the $4s. So can anyone defend the call knowing the NASDAQ decision is a week away? This call could be the very reason we end up getting denied, ergo if uplisting falls apart it’s on NP and his refusal to STFU when there’s nothing to report.
That said, I feel it’s worth reiterating that all of the science-based info we got on the call was excellent. But at this point it’s not just preaching to the converted it’s beating the converted over the head with what they already know. If LL didn’t work, none of us would be here so stop having these calls where the only positive message is that LL works.
WE KNOW IT WORKS. Monetize it already.
If NP had never PR’d a call and stayed silent until next week, I’m fairly confident we’d remain in the $4s. So can anyone defend the call knowing the NASDAQ decision is a week away? This call could be the very reason we end up getting denied, ergo if uplisting falls apart it’s on NP and his refusal to STFU when there’s nothing to report.
That said, I feel it’s worth reiterating that all of the science-based info we got on the call was excellent. But at this point it’s not just preaching to the converted it’s beating the converted over the head with what they already know. If LL didn’t work, none of us would be here so stop having these calls where the only positive message is that LL works.
WE KNOW IT WORKS. Monetize it already.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)