Are you saying what SFRX submitted to the USPTO was wrong?

Specifically, the SEASEARCHER remotely operated vehicles do not search for sites. Rather, the vehicles are deployed to pre-identified sites. The primary purpose of the vehicles is to collect data at the pre-identified sites. The pre-identified sites are not limited to the seas either.

Or are you saying SFRX will do what they did with Melbourne for years and simply claim the wreck is there?

School is in session and you are being called upon to explain your self.

Thanks in advance.