(Total Views: 722)
Posted On: 09/07/2020 12:02:22 AM
Post# of 149459
Re: thriftycents #54498
Well, that post makes me feel better, thrifty. Perhaps my obsession with the reasons for tuesday's meeting is not misplaced, and perhaps it is even shared by others
Another thing i wanted to say about next week's meetings is the wednesday mhra meeting.
For some reason i have in my mind that Wednesday's MHRA meeting was scheduled to be one hour. I probably remember this incorrectly.
In one hour, there is barely enough time to introduce everyone, let alone describe both the HIV BLA and the mild/moderate BLA.
There is probably not enough time to do all that in four hours.
In one hour, all you can do is really deliver a message. And maybe flag some consequences to look out for from the message impact.
But again, I probably have the "one hour" completely wrong.
But even if the meeting time is longer on Wednesday, you can't really discuss anything. There is so much information in these trials that all you could do is identify which documents are responsive. That alone could take hours. But again i probably don't have a clue.
Another thing i wanted to say about next week's meetings is the wednesday mhra meeting.
For some reason i have in my mind that Wednesday's MHRA meeting was scheduled to be one hour. I probably remember this incorrectly.
In one hour, there is barely enough time to introduce everyone, let alone describe both the HIV BLA and the mild/moderate BLA.
There is probably not enough time to do all that in four hours.
In one hour, all you can do is really deliver a message. And maybe flag some consequences to look out for from the message impact.
But again, I probably have the "one hour" completely wrong.
But even if the meeting time is longer on Wednesday, you can't really discuss anything. There is so much information in these trials that all you could do is identify which documents are responsive. That alone could take hours. But again i probably don't have a clue.
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
