(Total Views: 329)
Posted On: 08/21/2020 5:04:11 PM
Post# of 653
morokoy you've actually got that completely wrong
RL-100 goes right to the task The AE2 receptor, and masks or binds it so that the corona virus cannot enter. The AE2 receptor is how the corona virus enters.
RL-100 is stopping viral load in 2 - 3 days reportedly
Dr. Bruce Patterson reported 14 days for Leronlimab
That said RL-100 is administered by IV which may also be quicker acting, CYDY may have made a mistake not doing that.... Leronlimab may be much quicker if IV
That said RL-100 is being proposed to be administered by inhaler, which again, will be even quicker.
In any event, from what I understand both drugs act similarly
it is just that the AE2 is bound much quicker and directly by RL-100
Posted On: 08/19/2020 11:00:16 PM
Posted By: morokoy
Re: mc67 #39
The problem, is that there is no mention of aiding the immune system, and viral load suppression, unlike Leronlimab, but at least 1 out of three helps.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/938...z6Vmy1JTu9
RL-100 goes right to the task The AE2 receptor, and masks or binds it so that the corona virus cannot enter. The AE2 receptor is how the corona virus enters.
RL-100 is stopping viral load in 2 - 3 days reportedly
Dr. Bruce Patterson reported 14 days for Leronlimab
That said RL-100 is administered by IV which may also be quicker acting, CYDY may have made a mistake not doing that.... Leronlimab may be much quicker if IV
That said RL-100 is being proposed to be administered by inhaler, which again, will be even quicker.
In any event, from what I understand both drugs act similarly
it is just that the AE2 is bound much quicker and directly by RL-100
Posted On: 08/19/2020 11:00:16 PM
Posted By: morokoy
Re: mc67 #39
The problem, is that there is no mention of aiding the immune system, and viral load suppression, unlike Leronlimab, but at least 1 out of three helps.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/938...z6Vmy1JTu9
(0)
(0)
