(Total Views: 647)
Posted On: 08/17/2020 6:16:31 PM
Post# of 9144
Fred,
They’ve certainly gotten to you if you state “even if they’re right much of the time”.
They’re very calculatingly And deliberately ignoring the reality of the esteemed researchers responsible for the published papers on the NanoLogix tech. They’ve also completely ignored the Medical Industry resistance to disruptive technology and blaming NanoLogix and its management for not taking market share away from gargantuan multi billion dollar companies. They’ve conflated the discarded BNP and BNF tech with flatpack Petri tech and the N-Assay. Now they’re on a crusade to compare the company to Theranos and have frequently accused management of enriching themselves at our expense. You suspect there may be some motive Fred?
I’m tired of using faulty tests for CoVid19. The look of despair on the face of a patient when told they’re positive is heart wrenching. If they later test Negative they’re joyful, but they’ll never trust us again as much as they did.
Come on NanoLogix. Bring it.
Scott
They’ve certainly gotten to you if you state “even if they’re right much of the time”.
They’re very calculatingly And deliberately ignoring the reality of the esteemed researchers responsible for the published papers on the NanoLogix tech. They’ve also completely ignored the Medical Industry resistance to disruptive technology and blaming NanoLogix and its management for not taking market share away from gargantuan multi billion dollar companies. They’ve conflated the discarded BNP and BNF tech with flatpack Petri tech and the N-Assay. Now they’re on a crusade to compare the company to Theranos and have frequently accused management of enriching themselves at our expense. You suspect there may be some motive Fred?
I’m tired of using faulty tests for CoVid19. The look of despair on the face of a patient when told they’re positive is heart wrenching. If they later test Negative they’re joyful, but they’ll never trust us again as much as they did.
Come on NanoLogix. Bring it.
Scott
(5)
(0)
