We talk a lot about how the science of Leronlimab will carry the day and today I got to thinking about that a little more and thought I'd share my point of view.

We all know by now there are 2 camps passionately fighting it out over the legitimacy of CYDY and Leronlimab.

We know that many pro-CYDY posters and supporters here and elsewhere are doctors, scientists, work in healthcare, or have a science background (Dr. Been, Dr. Yo, and to some extent now, Dr. Drew, people close to me personally, plus a bunch of you folks here)

We know there are many doctors, scientists, healthcare workers, and science background people in the real world that can attest to the effectiveness of Leronlimab in both COVID-19 and HIV. (The doctors at Montefiore and UCLA, Dr. JL, anecdotal testimony from nurses, etc.) Same with its MOA - no detractors as far as I know.

And of course we have Dr. BP bringing the hard science.

My question is, have you ever seen a legit science person post anti-CYDY content? Maybe a few disgruntled shareholders on message boards, but even then they're criticizing management and not the science.

With regards to published media, I've never seen a negative article written by a science person, period.

By my calculation, that leaves the anti-CYDY camp completely devoid of science. But we already knew that.