(Total Views: 564)
Posted On: 08/08/2020 4:21:15 PM
Post# of 96881
Re: Futurecash #95403
Futurecrash, I refer you to the bashers handbook which you have followed over the last couple of months. Why does a person who has no interest in the stock continuously post negative items on a bulletin board? If the company never made any mistakes the price would not be in the pennies. We all know that. Pointing out these OLD mistakes over and over can only be explained in the BASHERS handbook. What many of us here who actually own shares believe is that there is potential in the company and we are willing to purchase shares at this low price in hopes that the company can someday become successful in spite of the efforts of the criminal enterprise that you belong to.
As to your recent post I refer you the basher item 22 ...
22. If the companies history/PR's are negative constantly point to that. Compile a list of this data prior to beginning your efforts.
https://messageboardfools.com/bashers.htm
Is the "Bashing" of a stock an essential part of the online investment landscape?
Our Constitution guarantees us free speech and we have always valued the lessons gleaned from dissent. When does dissent cross over that imaginary line and become "Bashing"? To often we find well grounded dissent capriciously labeled as "Bashing" by over zealous investors bent on protecting a stocks reputation at any cost. The "Bashing" that is addressed on this site is quite different from dissent. The Anatomy of a Basher strives to look at the calculated erosion of confidence in a given stock. Erosion by means that are, in every sense, void of truth, hinged on deception and innuendo, and motivated by greed at the expense of others. This compendium is offered to aid in identifying the telltale signs of "Bashing", and hopefully provide a counter balance to this heretofore unchecked manipulation of investors fears for personal gain.
IS IT EASIER TO SCARE PEOPLE INTO SELLING THAN IT IS TO SCARE PEOPLE INTO BUYING A STOCK? I have asked some knowledgeable investors this question and the answer is always: "YES, OF COURSE YES!"
As to your recent post I refer you the basher item 22 ...
22. If the companies history/PR's are negative constantly point to that. Compile a list of this data prior to beginning your efforts.
https://messageboardfools.com/bashers.htm
Is the "Bashing" of a stock an essential part of the online investment landscape?
Our Constitution guarantees us free speech and we have always valued the lessons gleaned from dissent. When does dissent cross over that imaginary line and become "Bashing"? To often we find well grounded dissent capriciously labeled as "Bashing" by over zealous investors bent on protecting a stocks reputation at any cost. The "Bashing" that is addressed on this site is quite different from dissent. The Anatomy of a Basher strives to look at the calculated erosion of confidence in a given stock. Erosion by means that are, in every sense, void of truth, hinged on deception and innuendo, and motivated by greed at the expense of others. This compendium is offered to aid in identifying the telltale signs of "Bashing", and hopefully provide a counter balance to this heretofore unchecked manipulation of investors fears for personal gain.
IS IT EASIER TO SCARE PEOPLE INTO SELLING THAN IT IS TO SCARE PEOPLE INTO BUYING A STOCK? I have asked some knowledgeable investors this question and the answer is always: "YES, OF COURSE YES!"
(8)
(1)Scroll down for more posts ▼
