NP has repeatedly told us for weeks that the results will be good. Why do we doubt him? I believe he loves the shareholders. Do you remember the first thing he said when the HIV BLA was announced at the conference call? I do. He said his mother in law wanted him to thank us for supporting the company. The only reason he does the proactive etc is to keep us updated. We complain about these, but why? We all watch them with eager anticipation. There’s no reason he would lie to us about the results being statistically significant. Think about that. What would his motivation be for giving us wrong information? It would be cruel and suicidal. I t would make no sense.

My only question is what if we meet all secondary endpoints but actually don’t meet primary endpoint? Somehow people are saying that is possible but why? I’ve looked at the last interview with Lalezari twice and he doesn’t say that primary won’t be met. He actually mentions primary and secondary in a positive way in same breath. I think it’s possible we met the primary endpoint earlier than 14 days. Playing devil’s advocate here, what if secondary are met and primary at 14 is just so so because we met it so early and placebo caught up by day 14? Approved?