(Total Views: 539)
Posted On: 08/05/2020 10:54:25 AM
Post# of 145890
Very simple. When you can not argue about science then do character assassination. Go after mgt. This is coming from their play book. I don't take any of these report seriously.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/605...z6UFu2HLwu
______________________
I'm afraid it's not that simple. Why would a well-known financial journalist expose himself AND his newspaper to character assassination charges? What's his motivation? What would he and WSJ gain at the cost of being accused in misrepresentation of a company developing a badly needed drug potentially able of solving a grave national crisis?
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/605...z6UFu2HLwu
______________________
I'm afraid it's not that simple. Why would a well-known financial journalist expose himself AND his newspaper to character assassination charges? What's his motivation? What would he and WSJ gain at the cost of being accused in misrepresentation of a company developing a badly needed drug potentially able of solving a grave national crisis?
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)
Whatever happens, we have got
Le-Ron-Li-Mab, and they have not.
Le-Ron-Li-Mab, and they have not.