(Total Views: 382)
Posted On: 08/04/2020 12:05:07 PM
Post# of 36564
Hi DJ,
thank you for your open words. Yes, I am one of those extremely long term investors. I got to knowe GNBT in 2005 and have held at least some share of that company for almost the entire 15 years.
Even though I am disappointed about the last couple of PRs, I still think that the company has a lot of potential and that most of everything currently depends on the availability of funding.
Once they get a hold of some significant funds, I guess they will be able to jump start one business unit after the next and soon there will be much better times for investors, who keep the faith in and patience with the company as a whole.
A positive BARDA decision would surely be the best available option, however, just the IPO of NGIO should provide enough capital such that GNBT/NGIO can do it all on its own as well.
In regards to the last CC's recording. I am quite sure that I know the reason why they are not publishing it.
It is the BARDA application. We've been told many times over that they are very quickly very unhappy with applicants, who are talking too much about the application or their technology that they apply for funding for. So as long they remain in the "only what has been said" form, they can always claim "no, no, that is not what we said", but should they publish a transcript or audio recording, which I am certain that they have available, then people can dive deep into it, quote them and then maybe even want to do harm to GNBT and make quotes available to BARDA, just to cause them to deny them. Just to make sure that this is not possible, they have not published the recording/transcript. I am almost 100% positive, that this is the reason why they have and will not make that publicly available.
Hope this puts this into a little bit different perspective for you!?
thank you for your open words. Yes, I am one of those extremely long term investors. I got to knowe GNBT in 2005 and have held at least some share of that company for almost the entire 15 years.
Even though I am disappointed about the last couple of PRs, I still think that the company has a lot of potential and that most of everything currently depends on the availability of funding.
Once they get a hold of some significant funds, I guess they will be able to jump start one business unit after the next and soon there will be much better times for investors, who keep the faith in and patience with the company as a whole.
A positive BARDA decision would surely be the best available option, however, just the IPO of NGIO should provide enough capital such that GNBT/NGIO can do it all on its own as well.
In regards to the last CC's recording. I am quite sure that I know the reason why they are not publishing it.
It is the BARDA application. We've been told many times over that they are very quickly very unhappy with applicants, who are talking too much about the application or their technology that they apply for funding for. So as long they remain in the "only what has been said" form, they can always claim "no, no, that is not what we said", but should they publish a transcript or audio recording, which I am certain that they have available, then people can dive deep into it, quote them and then maybe even want to do harm to GNBT and make quotes available to BARDA, just to cause them to deny them. Just to make sure that this is not possible, they have not published the recording/transcript. I am almost 100% positive, that this is the reason why they have and will not make that publicly available.
Hope this puts this into a little bit different perspective for you!?
(1)
(0)
