(Total Views: 660)
Posted On: 07/31/2020 4:27:28 PM
Post# of 145903
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
I've said this a couple times. People asking about what Dr. JL is talking about. What he has said in both these CC is that the SAEs... ARE... the results.
Think about it, if you are looking at M2M the only people not getting better after 7 days is the people who have SAEs, especially in the placebo group.
So the SAEs being 59% better than placebo, means the drug works 59% better than placebo.
Those N.E.W.S. readouts have a lot of data points, but NP said Lero was better at each point 3-7-14 days, and most likely with the numbers were the best for the people you treat that have SAEs. Their numbers would go down the most at 14 days.
Think about it, if you are looking at M2M the only people not getting better after 7 days is the people who have SAEs, especially in the placebo group.
So the SAEs being 59% better than placebo, means the drug works 59% better than placebo.
Those N.E.W.S. readouts have a lot of data points, but NP said Lero was better at each point 3-7-14 days, and most likely with the numbers were the best for the people you treat that have SAEs. Their numbers would go down the most at 14 days.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)