MD Virologist, I read your posts religiously, I think you’re one of the best source of info on here along with 5-6 frequently posting people. You’re the only one of gravity presenting the less desirable option and so I think you bring balance to the board.

I have been expressing similar opinions to yours but because I don’t have your credentials or experience I have been bullied quite a bit on here. My criticism has exclusively been on NP (and not I’ll intended, I recognize the amazing achievement of bringing the company where it currently is). I also suggested, just like you, that remains chairman and give the CEO work to someone else (so I’m happy to see that you recommend a similar thing, it tells me I have good instincts). My recommendation was BP. But unfortunately it looks like it could never head that way. Which is a shame cause BP could it perfect; he has knowledge and pedigree, things that the big institutions would appreciate.

I pray that I’m wrong and that NP shuts me up by leading the company to greater success.

PS: Lead, follow or get out of the way. Good one!