The fact that so many people interested here are arguing about the data and what was presented indicates how poorly the PR was written again.

It seems every time there is a PR I read it on my phone in the morning, put down my phone and ask myself "what did i just read?" Then i think "well its probably good news, but it was presented and worded so poorly that it will be spun as bad"

And I'm an investor actively aware of CYDY goings on, so i kinda know what to expect. Imagine for someone looking to invest. They would read the PR and have to analyze and process the jumbled verbiage and syntax, read between the lines, refer to other sources to fully understand the PR. Thats not much of a sales pitch or promotion. A PR should never have to be explained or clarified. It needs to stand on its own and clearly state its reason. Especially if it is good news.

I dont know if this is true as i havent seen the latest video yet, but i thought i just read a comment that the one death was due to a car wreck. It is inconceivable to me that you would add irrelevant data without explanation. Its just as bad in reverse when Covid stats include car wrecks in the covid death toll.

It seems to me that NP refuses to learn from this. It is mind boggling to me to continue to put out information that only makes logical sense to the writer of the PR. This is a pattern that is not going to stop. The fact that this is not the first PR in recent weeks to be clarified or reissued should be an embarrassment to the writer and NP (assuming they are different...)

Leronlimab is still a great drug and will eventually get there. I am just thinking this is like a running back training by dragging the little parachute behind them or running in a pool. We are still making progress and being held back by the circumstances we put ourselves in. Once we are out of the pool and on the field we will be even faster... I hope.