(Total Views: 636)
Posted On: 07/21/2020 3:23:11 PM
Post# of 156033
MAV MD Thanks for clarifying the closeted misinformation. The leronlimab group did 50+% better than placebo grp.
Your comment is worth repeating below:
That is not correct.
21.4% versus 8.9% of patients in placebo versus Lero, respectively, experienced SAE's
they used total number of SAE's (multiple per patient) to create this fictitious 39%
CONSIDER THIS:
What if 14 of the placebo group had 56 SAE's ? Would it be a 50% rate or 200% rate? Can't have greater than 100% of people having SAE's. Hopefully this clarifies their error.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/605...z6SrJXVfXk
Your comment is worth repeating below:
That is not correct.
21.4% versus 8.9% of patients in placebo versus Lero, respectively, experienced SAE's
they used total number of SAE's (multiple per patient) to create this fictitious 39%
CONSIDER THIS:
What if 14 of the placebo group had 56 SAE's ? Would it be a 50% rate or 200% rate? Can't have greater than 100% of people having SAE's. Hopefully this clarifies their error.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/605...z6SrJXVfXk
(0)
(0)
