(Total Views: 697)
Posted On: 07/21/2020 11:58:48 AM
Post# of 154056
So the new PR fixes the top bullet, sort of.
Now it says 39% (of what?) reported SAEs. Still misleading, as that implies subjects, not number of SAEs per subject.
Man, it's not that difficult.
The best way to report it is SAE rate between groups.
Placebo group had .39 SAEs per subject.
LL arm had .14 SAEs per subject.
or just report % of subjects with SAEs. I guess they are trying to make the numbers look "better."
Looking forward to the efficacy results. Those should be clear!
Now it says 39% (of what?) reported SAEs. Still misleading, as that implies subjects, not number of SAEs per subject.
Man, it's not that difficult.
The best way to report it is SAE rate between groups.
Placebo group had .39 SAEs per subject.
LL arm had .14 SAEs per subject.
or just report % of subjects with SAEs. I guess they are trying to make the numbers look "better."
Looking forward to the efficacy results. Those should be clear!
(1)
(0)
