(Total Views: 599)
Posted On: 07/18/2020 2:43:58 PM
Post# of 11802
So SEC attorney Perkins, who doubles as DECN's prosecutor, lies big time on May 20 in his Declaration under oath, and gets caught, in fact caught so much so that his lies aren't doubled down on in the July 1 SEC filing, and then he lies again on July 1 about FINRA and gets caught by DECN who has an exculpatory document. This raises two questions:
1. why would a lawyer lie under oath, get caught in the lies (primarily by DECN Shareholder Letter #1) and then lie again, only to be caught. Aren't these ethical violations? And for all I know Perkins posts on iHub because he sure sounds like those gavonnes.
2. and if both of the master documents the SEC uses to explain why DECN was suspended are now fruit of a poisoned tree, what does the SEC have to explain the suspension -- only iHub cabal lies?
1. why would a lawyer lie under oath, get caught in the lies (primarily by DECN Shareholder Letter #1) and then lie again, only to be caught. Aren't these ethical violations? And for all I know Perkins posts on iHub because he sure sounds like those gavonnes.
2. and if both of the master documents the SEC uses to explain why DECN was suspended are now fruit of a poisoned tree, what does the SEC have to explain the suspension -- only iHub cabal lies?
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
