I listened yesterday to the interview and got busy afterwards.
I like them, and actually NP told us why he was doing it:
That what he has been doing for long time and I appreciate it. For me, any bit of information is very valuable so I can assess my investment, and, as I said before I prefer his "unpolished" and too honest approach to that of other CEO's. I recently attended another company presentation where, after 1/2 hour of talking I was not sure what was said (lots of nice, empty, words like operationase, holistic, onboarding, mission-critical, seamless, de-contextualize).
We got a better timeframe for M-M results, also, I learned that maybe the two trials will not be released simultaneously (which had been suggested before). Also, that the interim of 50 patients will not happen (thanks God) and there is a tough that maybe 50% of the total can be a possible number.
I learned as well that definitely we will be joining NASDAQ and not NYSE-Market. Additionally it was reaffirmed that Patterson is indeed analyzing the blood samples (had been discussed before but more on the-fly, so to speak). Additionally it appears that there are 47000 of us (important information) as opposed to 2000+ few months ago.
But, even if this information had not been offered to us, I study the body language and the voice inflexions to try and determine NP general "level of certainty" in regards to what he is saying.
Remember, he is the most informed person in the world about CYDY, what he says and how he says matters. Even in a colloquial environment. Therefore, keep the interviews coming, in any shape or form.
I am aware some of you don't like them and I appreciate that. Not me.
Can he be a belter communicator ?? Yes, he has a substancial handicap on that his mother tongue is not English, but I like it, that way he doesn't burnish reality. Once again, many of you would like a better communication, so do I, but he is the way he is. I understood that many years ago when the SP was on the .30's and have learned to live with it.
The important thing in near future is the results of M-M trial. Period. If these are good we will be rewarded immediately. If they are not, we will need to wait for S-C.
Our COVID time is approaching, as Patterson said: "We will soon know where we sand in the COVID world".
Only one thing matters near future: The clinical results of the COVID trials.
We have a bright future down the road, not sure if everybody here "remembers" (some pun) that we have the HIV and humongous Oncology markets completely open to us and we have been advancing towards the goal during these "COVID times".
So, make sure you have popcorn (and champagne) and let's wait to see where we stand in the world of COVID.
I like them, and actually NP told us why he was doing it:
Quote:visibility and publicity strategy
That what he has been doing for long time and I appreciate it. For me, any bit of information is very valuable so I can assess my investment, and, as I said before I prefer his "unpolished" and too honest approach to that of other CEO's. I recently attended another company presentation where, after 1/2 hour of talking I was not sure what was said (lots of nice, empty, words like operationase, holistic, onboarding, mission-critical, seamless, de-contextualize).
We got a better timeframe for M-M results, also, I learned that maybe the two trials will not be released simultaneously (which had been suggested before). Also, that the interim of 50 patients will not happen (thanks God) and there is a tough that maybe 50% of the total can be a possible number.
I learned as well that definitely we will be joining NASDAQ and not NYSE-Market. Additionally it was reaffirmed that Patterson is indeed analyzing the blood samples (had been discussed before but more on the-fly, so to speak). Additionally it appears that there are 47000 of us (important information) as opposed to 2000+ few months ago.
But, even if this information had not been offered to us, I study the body language and the voice inflexions to try and determine NP general "level of certainty" in regards to what he is saying.
Remember, he is the most informed person in the world about CYDY, what he says and how he says matters. Even in a colloquial environment. Therefore, keep the interviews coming, in any shape or form.
I am aware some of you don't like them and I appreciate that. Not me.
Can he be a belter communicator ?? Yes, he has a substancial handicap on that his mother tongue is not English, but I like it, that way he doesn't burnish reality. Once again, many of you would like a better communication, so do I, but he is the way he is. I understood that many years ago when the SP was on the .30's and have learned to live with it.
The important thing in near future is the results of M-M trial. Period. If these are good we will be rewarded immediately. If they are not, we will need to wait for S-C.
Our COVID time is approaching, as Patterson said: "We will soon know where we sand in the COVID world".
Only one thing matters near future: The clinical results of the COVID trials.
We have a bright future down the road, not sure if everybody here "remembers" (some pun) that we have the HIV and humongous Oncology markets completely open to us and we have been advancing towards the goal during these "COVID times".
So, make sure you have popcorn (and champagne) and let's wait to see where we stand in the world of COVID.
13
