To be honest, I have no idea what Nader is talking about now. Everyone's posts about possible interpretations are valid and I have no idea. It could be the "major pharma" comment today is referring to some other company than the "big pharma" he referred to previously. maybe the same, who knows?

I will say, that when he was dis-crediting The hit article, he discussed the shared drive of information that is accessible to those that sign an NDA. This was my assumption that this might be how the "major" or "big" pharma saw enough data to sign an agreement, that might be for distribution or licensing or something.

I do think it is just so Nader to have a proactive interview to dis-credit the citron article, and throw in a comment about deaths in the severe trial so all the crap talkers have new ammunition to do more crap talk. Why did he even have to bring up the deaths?