You don't think it is interesting that they were told by the FDA to stop the EINDs? Or that Nader said they are going with the data as of 6/15 and not any further than that date? That is not normal. I'm merely making assumptions as to why this would happen. I have a hard time how you can claim it is a bad assumption, It could be a wrong assumption, but bad suggests there is a more obvious explanation. I would like to hear what you think the explanation is, I fully know that Nader's timelines change as a rule and that the FDA takes a long time to process info. Those 2 issues do not change these unique comments made by Nader and the FDA.