(Total Views: 623)
Posted On: 05/24/2020 12:10:47 PM
Post# of 153915
This reply is primarily for TechGuru and RexE, who have been having a good discussion about statistics.
Our local paper (San Jose) had some information today saying that the original "88%" paper in JAMA had been revised (all the way down to 24%).
I did some googling and found the USA today article below and the actual JAMA revision below. I'm not a big statistics person, so haven't tried to dig all the way in. But, am curious if this revision is significant. At one point, I think Dr. Patterson might have referenced the JAMA study.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2765367
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2020/05/0...080189001/
Our local paper (San Jose) had some information today saying that the original "88%" paper in JAMA had been revised (all the way down to 24%).
I did some googling and found the USA today article below and the actual JAMA revision below. I'm not a big statistics person, so haven't tried to dig all the way in. But, am curious if this revision is significant. At one point, I think Dr. Patterson might have referenced the JAMA study.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2765367
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2020/05/0...080189001/
(0)
(0)
