(Total Views: 812)
Posted On: 05/05/2020 6:14:23 AM
Post# of 9903
Just to follow up on this post 8880 (read that one first). The other party who's working against Abarca is Eduardo Gonzalez Arciga. This is a new name and popped out of nowhere on the concession titles since May 30 2017. So the court case is taking 3 years already. I mentioned that nothing could be done with these mines until that court case settled. Well, according to Charly22's information this court case is still ongoing. So I agree that this deal the private
owners of the mines had with GoGold should not have continued and does not look legal to me. They should have at least waited until this court case had finished and then made their move.
According to post 9508 the points 3,4,5,6,9, and 10 could make the deal the private owners of the mines had with GoGold null and void in the future. This looks somewhat the same as BGL going after the mines in court while SRGE was operating the mines. Something always happens while operating these mines. Because, if point 9 of post 9508 is true, then GoGold will lose the contract and the mines in the future. It will be interesting to see how this develops and if GoGold can maintain these mines.
owners of the mines had with GoGold should not have continued and does not look legal to me. They should have at least waited until this court case had finished and then made their move.
According to post 9508 the points 3,4,5,6,9, and 10 could make the deal the private owners of the mines had with GoGold null and void in the future. This looks somewhat the same as BGL going after the mines in court while SRGE was operating the mines. Something always happens while operating these mines. Because, if point 9 of post 9508 is true, then GoGold will lose the contract and the mines in the future. It will be interesting to see how this develops and if GoGold can maintain these mines.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
