(Total Views: 527)
Posted On: 05/04/2020 12:32:49 PM
Post# of 148936
My posting history speaks for itself. Feel sorry that a bit of realism is a threat to you and you feel the need to attack. Not very becoming of a doctor.
If the CEO exercised and lent the money to the company, it should have been documented with a PR explaining the loan arrangement between the CEO and the company. That should have been followed by an SEC filing.
Please point me to either.
Second, if the CEO is providing selective disclosure to some (and I have no reason not believe the monk-I defended him recently as well.), then we have other problems.
I'm sorry you interpret realism as a short bias. But your supposition is baseless sir. I'm neither a cheerleader or a short. I will always keep it real. If that's a threat to you, I suggest you put me on ignore and move on.
If the CEO exercised and lent the money to the company, it should have been documented with a PR explaining the loan arrangement between the CEO and the company. That should have been followed by an SEC filing.
Please point me to either.
Second, if the CEO is providing selective disclosure to some (and I have no reason not believe the monk-I defended him recently as well.), then we have other problems.
I'm sorry you interpret realism as a short bias. But your supposition is baseless sir. I'm neither a cheerleader or a short. I will always keep it real. If that's a threat to you, I suggest you put me on ignore and move on.
(4)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
